Legal Opinion

United States v. Todd Lewis Hopkins

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 10, 2001No. 00-7099PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge LUTTIG joined.

OPINION

KING, Circuit Judge:

Todd Lewis Hopkins appeals the district court’s dismissal, for lack of timeliness, of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. According to Hopkins, his petition was timely because the one-year period of limitation established in § 2255 did not commence to run until the Supreme Court’s recent stop and frisk decision in Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266, 120 S.Ct. 1375, 146 L.Ed.2d 254 (2000). As explained below, we find it unnecessary to consider whether Hopkins’ § 2255…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. KingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Corbett v. McDadeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Carlos McClammyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API