Clark v. Homrighous
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THEIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the plaintiff’s appeal of the magistrate’s order (Doc. 34) and motion to consolidate discovery (Doc. 49). This is a personal injury action arising out of a motor vehicle accident.
This appeal arises out of defendants’ motion to allow ex parte interviews with plaintiff’s treating physicians. Plaintiff opposed this motion, arguing only that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for ex parte communications with plaintiff’s health care providers. The magistrate granted defendant’s motion for ex parte…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Drake v. City of Fort CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Sil-Flo, Inc. v. SFHC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Horner v. Rowan Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
- Perkins Ex Rel. Miles v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1995
- Hall v. DoeringDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Cotracom Commodity Trading Co. v. Seaboard Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Lake v. SteevesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994