Horst v. Horst

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BURNS, J.

In this divorce case, defendant-wife contends that the lower court:

1. Failed to provide her with adequate relief during the pendente lite period;

2. Violated Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 580-47 (1976), as amended,

a) by making an unjust and inequitable division of property;

b) by requiring husband to pay only $3,000.00 of wife’s attorney’s fees and costs; and

c) by not requiring husband to pay any of wife’s attorney’s fees and costs on appeal; and

3. Erred in admitting and considering evidence of problems created by the presence of wife’s mother.

We affirm the…