Legal Opinion

State v. Chandler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2006No. Nos. 2004-1325 and 2004-1746PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} These consolidated discretionary appeals raise the issue of whether a person can be subject to the special penalty statute applicable to a major drug offender for a first-degree felony drug conviction when the substance offered as crack cocaine contains no detectable amount of the drug.

{¶ 2} Appellee Phillip Bledsoe was the subject of an undercover investigation conducted by the Massillon City Police Department and the FBI. During the investigation, a confidential informant was used to make a number of controlled buys of crack cocaine from Bledsoe. The last of these transactions was to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Rice v. CertainTeed Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. MughniOhio Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. MontoyaOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Garr v. Warden, Madison Corr. Inst.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. HitsmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API