Legal Opinion

Garr v. Warden, Madison Corr. Inst.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2010No. 2009-1323PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, has certified the following question for our resolution: “Whether the Supreme Court of Ohio’s decision in State v. Chandler, 109 Ohio St.3d 223, 2006-Ohio-2285 [846 N.E.2d 1234] (2006), as described in the syllabus of the court, to wit: ‘[a] substance offered for sale must contain some detectable amount of the relevant controlled substance before a person can be sentenced as a major drug offender under Ohio Revised Code § 2925.03(C)(4)(g),’ extends to cases where the substance offered for sale was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. ChandlerOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. PattersonOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Garr v. WardenOhio Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. Gonzales (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. MontoyaOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. WrightOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. BurseOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. State v. DiloOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API