Legal Opinion

Hyde v. Casey-Grimshaw Marble Co. ex rel. Sherburne

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 10, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Attachment and Garnishment Proceedings.—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. John Baeton Payne, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1898.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

E. A. Sherburne sued appellee in attachment, and William Grace and Frank D. Hyde, partners, under the firm name of Grace & Hyde, were named in the writ of attachment as garnishees. Frank D. Hyde only was served. Hyde, in his answer to interrogatories propounded to him and Grace as garnishees, admitted that Grace & Hyde, as partners, were indebted to the marble company, the defendant in attachment, in the sum of $822.47. Such proceedings were had in the suit that November 11, 1893, judgment was rendered against the marble company for $886.38 by default, from which $314.10 was subsequently…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sandusky v. SidwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Coursen v. BrowningIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Grace v. Casey-Grimshaw Marble Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Raphael v. HartmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  2. Kling v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API