Legal Opinion

Raphael v. Hartman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 26, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Assumpsit, on a contract in writing. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elbridge Hanecy, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Windes

April 10, 18.96, at the city of Hew York, Hartman, Goldsmith & Co., a partnership composed of Elias Hartman, A. Goldsmith and 0. Forges, employed plaintiff in error as a traveling agent for the sale of their imported and domestic goods for the cities of the United States, and entered into a contract in writing for that purpose, by which they agreed to employ him “ for a period of one year, commencing April 11, 1896,” at a salary of $2,500 per annum, payable every first day of each month, and such necessary traveling expenses as might arise. Said Raphael, by the contract, which was signed only…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vogel v. PekocIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Sellers v. GreerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Heinsen v. LambIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Miller v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Sandusky v. SidwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brewer v. De Camp Glass Casket Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Forsyth v. BarnesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  3. Brown v. HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Sear v. MooreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API