Legal Opinion

Burns v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 26, 1932No. 15198Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Most of the questions discussed in our original opinion and those presented in the motion for rehearing found their way into the record because of the consolidation of cases predicated on separate indictments against appellants, and because of a joint trial. We said in Sims v. State, 119 Texas Crim. Rep., 83, 45 S. W. (2d) 579: “Experience and observation demonstrates that the joint trial of two individuals upon separate indictments leads to confusion and difficulty in preparing a record for appeal.” The truth of the above statement is further…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Oates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Josef v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  3. Puryear v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Abbott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Baggett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API