Legal Opinion
DaPurificacao v. ZON. BD. OF ADJUST.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 11, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
873 A.2d 582 (2005)
377 N.J. Super. 436
Manuel DaPURIFICACAO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF the TOWNSHIP OF UNION and Township of Union, Defendants-Respondents.
Township of Union, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Manuel Dapurificacao, Defendant-Appellant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 2, 2005.
Decided May 11, 2005.
Robert Brotman, Elizabeth, argued the cause for appellant.
William C. Sullivan, Jr., Lyndhurst, argued the cause for respondent Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Township of Union (Scarinci & Hollenbeck, attorneys; Mr. Sullivan, of counsel and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR TOWNSHIP OF CHATHAMNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- State v. PT & L. Construction Company, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Shim v. Washington Township Planning BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Tanis v. Township of HamptonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Graff v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Woll S. v. Monaghan TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Homemaker Serv. v. Bd. of ChosenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005