Legal Opinion

Protests 36693-G of Joseph, Inc.

United States Customs Court

Decided December 27, 1938No. 40233Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) fabrics or articles composed wholly or in chief value of artificial silk the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent under paragraph 31; (2) embroidered wearing apparel in part of lace or trimmings at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, Glemby’s v. United States, (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) followed; (3) artificial flowers the same as those passed upon in Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. *50543473) at 60 percent under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Glemby's Sons Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Stern v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API