Protests 36693-G of Joseph, Inc.
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Tilson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) fabrics or articles composed wholly or in chief value of artificial silk the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent under paragraph 31; (2) embroidered wearing apparel in part of lace or trimmings at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, Glemby’s v. United States, (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) followed; (3) artificial flowers the same as those passed upon in Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. *50543473) at 60 percent under…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Glemby's Sons Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Stern v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925