Curry v. Pope County Equalization Board
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
JIM GUNTER, Justice.
| |AppeIlant appeals the circuit court’s order finding that improvements made to appellant’s property prior to his sixty-fifth birthday were “substantial improvements” within the meaning of amendment 79 to the Arkansas Constitution and that appel-lees would be allowed to include these improvements in the assessment of appellant’s property. On appeal, appellant asserts that the circuit court erred in its interpretation and application of amendment 79. Because this case involves the interpretation or construction of the Constitution of Arkansas, this court has jurisdiction…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. Sidney Moncrief Pontiac, Buick, GMC Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Nucor Corp. v. KilmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- State v. OldnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Morgan v. StocksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Muldoon v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jonesboro Healthcare Center, LLC v. Eaton-Moery Environmental Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- Hickory Heights Health & Rehab, LLC v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- Wyatt v. WyattCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- Lakshminarayana Chekuri v. Madhuri NekkalapudiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
- State of Arkansas; Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration; And Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration, Alcoholic Beverage Control Division v. Good Day Farm Arkansas, LLC; And Capital City Medicinals, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.