Legal Opinion

Timmons v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 21, 2014No. 2 CA-CV 2013-0053PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Carol Timmons appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee Ross Dress For Less, Inc. (Ross). For the following reasons, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶ 2 In reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we view the facts in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered. In re 1996 Nissan Sentra, 201 Ariz. 114, ¶ 2, 32 P.3d 39, 41 (App. 2001). In December 2011, Timmons tripped and fell on one of two curbs or steps outside…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Gipson v. KaseyArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ephraim Dabush v. Seacret Direct LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Lattin v. ShamrockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  3. Lewis v. Marriott International IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  4. Metro Phx Bank v. RpmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  5. Mw2 Investments v. Imh SpecialCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API