Legal Opinion
Hill v. Moore
Texas Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1892No. 7170PublishedCited by 39 opinions
Error from Denton. Tried below before Hon. F. E. Fixer.
1Opinion of the Court
STAYTON, Chief Justice.
This case was before this court at a former term, and is reported in 62 Texas, 610.
The material facts are as follows:
“ R. R. Jowell and Martha P. Ragsdale married in Texas in 1835. They lived together in said State as husband and wife, in Cherokee County, until the death of Martha, in the fall of 1848. Her husband and one child (Mary Ann, born October 20, 1836) survived her. Mary Ann married F. M. Hill, February 12, 1852, and died March 10, 1872, leaving as her heirs her said husband, F. M. Hill, and the other plaintiffs in this suit—George R., born in 1857, Richard D.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Demarest v. WynkoopNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- Hill v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Babb v. CarrollTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Wilson v. McCartyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
- Hatch v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1854
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Associated Oil Co. v. HartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Loomis v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- New York and Texas Land Co. v. HylandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Texas Employers' Ins. v. HerringTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Hardy Oil Company v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.