Legal Opinion

Karlstad State Bank v. Fritsche

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 10, 1985No. C3-85-13PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Louis and Jeanette Fritsche were in the business of breeding exotic cattle and obtained financing from the Karlstad State Bank and the Production Credit Association of Grand Forks. This action involves three lawsuits related to their cattle business that were consolidated for trial.

In the first, Karlstad State Bank sued the Fritsches individually to foreclose on collateral pledged as security and to obtain a deficiency judgment. The Fritsches asserted a counterclaim for fraud and alleged the foreclosure sale of their cattle was commercially unreasonable. In the second…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Klein v. First Edina National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Chemlease Worldwide Inc. v. Brace, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Fedders Corp. v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
  4. Buchman Plumbing Co. v. Regents of University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Pederson v. Rose Cooperative Creamery Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. In the Matter of Excello Press, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Metlife Capital Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Karlstad State Bank v. FritscheCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. HertzbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API