Legal Opinion

State v. Henry D.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 16, 2017No. AC37118PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavine, J.

The defendant, Henry D., appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of one count of attempt to commit sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 (a) (2) and 53a-70 (a) (2) and one count of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (2). The defendant claims that (1) the trial court abused its discretion in admitting into evidence the victim's recorded forensic interview as a prior consistent statement, and (2) the prosecutor committed an impropriety when he used a puzzle analogy in his rebuttal closing…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. State v. KulmacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. State v. LindsayWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Lord v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. LusterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SantiagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  2. Kail Jay Vanderpool v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2025
  3. Kail Jay Vanderpool v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2025
  4. State v. Henry D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API