Legal Opinion
United States v. Chapman
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 4, 2012No. 10-5071PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge HAMILTON wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge DIAZ joined.
OPINION
HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge:
Section 922(g)(8) of Title 18 of the United States Code prohibits a person who is subject to a domestic violence protective order issued under certain specified circumstances from, inter alia, possessing a firearm or ammunition in or affecting interstate commerce. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8). The sole issue raised on appeal by Ronald Chapman (Chapman) is whether his conviction on one count of violating § 922(g)(8) survives his as-applied…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Rickey I. Kanter v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Raymond Woollard v. Denis GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Clifford Tyler v. Hillsdale County Sheriff's Dep'tCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Justin TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.