Copeland v. Stewart
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
RAWLINGS, Justice.
Damage action for alienating affections of plaintiff’s wife resulted in a jury verdict for plaintiff. From judgment accordingly entered defendant appeals. We affirm.
Carroll (plaintiff) and Frances Copeland (Frances) were married in 1949. Five children were born to them.
Mr. and Mrs. Copeland ultimately became active NFO members. In 1968 Frances accepted employment as a secretary in the NFO office at Fairfield. There she became acquainted with defendant, James Stewart, a national director of the organization. The positions held by these two required that they often work…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Castner v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Allen v. LindemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Glatstein v. GrundSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Castner v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Knudsen v. Merle Hay Plaza, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rick v. BoegelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973