Legal Opinion

FUEYO

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1989No. ID 3114PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3114 MATTER OF FUEYO In Deportation Proceedings A-19687475 Decided by Board July 5, 1989 (1) Evidence that the respondent was taken into custody and deported by the Immigration and Naturalization Service establishes that she was "arrested and deported" within the meaning of section 212(aX17) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.0 § 1182(a)(17) (1982). (2) The burden is on the respondent to prove that, following her deportation, she applied for and received consent to reapply for admission to the United States from the Attorney General or his designate (3) A…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Francisco Pena-Cabanillas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  2. United States v. Mahmoud Mansour Hussein (81-1085), Esteban Aguirre-Flores (81-1220)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Cedric NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Pedro Solis-Davila v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. SAUNDERSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. TIJAMBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1998
  2. Victor Jimenez-Rodriguez v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  3. Atunnise v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. KHANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2016
  5. Sina Sunday v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API