Biddle v. Whitmore
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Douglas county to -compel defendant to renew plaintiff’s lease with her, that he be permitted to remain in possession of the premises for the term of one year from March 1, 1915, and to enjoin defendant and her husband from interfering with plaintiff’s possession except as a right to do so is reserved in the lease. The case was tried before Eoeser, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Douglas county to -compel defendant to renew plaintiff’s lease with her, that he be permitted to remain in possession of the premises for the term of one year from March 1, 1915, and to enjoin defendant and her husband from interfering with plaintiff’s possession except as a right to do so is reserved in the lease. The case was tried before Eoeser, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff. The motion of defendant Eliza for amended findings and conclusions of law was denied. From the order denying her motion for' a new trial, defendant…
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
Defendant is the owner of a large farm in Douglas county, which she leased to plaintiff for the term of one year commencing March 1, 1914, and ending March 1, 1915. The lease was in writing,-in the form of the usual cropping contract, and imposed upon plaintiff as the tenant certain specific duties and obligations, and vested in defendant as the landlord certain specific rights in and to the crops to be raised and in the direction of the farming operations. Plaintiff took possession and operated the farm during the term fixed by the lease, and so far as appears, in full compliance with the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Benjamin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Phœnix v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
- Hanson v. MarionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Koch v. FischerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Pfiffner v. Stillwater & St. Paul RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shaughnessy v. EidsmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Bergstein v. BergquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Formanek v. LangtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Anderson v. CollinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
- Pierce v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.