Legal Opinion

Pfiffner v. Stillwater & St. Paul Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 7, 1877PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Washington county, where the action was tried before Crosby, J., without a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Gileillan, C. 3:

Action in trespass for entering upon, taking possession of, and continuing to use for railroad purposes a strip of land belonging to plaintiff. The answer sets up, as a defence and .counterclaim, and asks for the specific performance of, an oral agreement by plaintiff to convey the strip in question to defendant.

In 1869 defendant procured the condemnation to its use, in constructing its road, of a strip of plaintiff’s land, near to that in question, but afterwards concluded to change its line, and run it over the latter, and thereupon, without the consent of plaintiff, ran its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parkhurst v. Van CortlandCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1816

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Formby v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  2. Uhlman v. Farm, Stock & Home Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Morrison v. HerrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Gilfillan v. SchallerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Biddle v. WhitmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API