Legal Opinion

Hartley v. Meyer

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 5, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from sixth district court. Summary proceedings by Marcellus Hartley against Arthur L. Meyer to obtain possession of demised premises. From an order awarding possession to plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The Lexington Improvement Company, as owner of the premises 128 East Thirty-Fourth street, in the city of Ne.w York, by mortgage dated November 27, 18,88, and recorded on the next succeeding day, mortgaged the same to the Washington Life Insurance Company, and by indenture dated April 1, 1891, leased a portion of the same premises to Arthur L. Meyer, its manager, for 18 months from said April 1,1891, at the monthly rental of $250, payable in advance. Subsequently to the mortgage the mortgagor became indebted to Meyer in the sum of $1,500 for salary, and to his wife in the sum of $2,200 for…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boteler v. LeberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  2. Fletcher v. McKeonNew York Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Isaacs v. GreenbergAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API