Legal Opinion

Boteler v. Leber

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 28, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill in this cause was filed, and an order to show cause why a receiver of rents should not be appointed advised and served, on November 22d 1932, and a receiver was appointed November 29th, 1932. At the time of his appointment Holmes and Von Schmid held a lease for a portion of the mortgaged premises at a rental of $90 per month, payable on the first day of the month. The receiver demanded the rent due December 1st and it was refused, the tenants claiming that they were not liable to the receiver as they had already, on October 1st, 1932, paid their landlord, the mortgagor, four months'…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Fairchild-Baldwin Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  2. Fitchburg Cotton Manufactory Corp. v. MelvenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1818
  3. Fletcher v. McKeonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
  5. Grether v. NickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kirkeby Corp. v. Cross Bridge Towers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  2. Chemical Bank New Jersey, N.A. v. City of AbseconNew Jersey Tax Court · 1992
  3. Martinique Realty Corp. v. HullNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Pearce v. GaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Lockridge v. Citizens Trust Co. of GreencastleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API