Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1988No. 18467PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The issue raised in this appeal is whether the district courts of Nevada have the authority to dismiss criminal charges for insufficiency of the evidence following a jury verdict of guilty. We conclude that they do not and, therefore, reverse and remand to the district court so that it may consider respondent’s motion for a new trial.

Robert Lee Wilson, respondent, was charged with two counts of making false claims for insurance benefits and one count of conspiracy to present such claims.

On June 11, 1987, Wilson filed a motion to suppress in-court identifications and dismiss the…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. Haas v. SchwabeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. BusscherNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. CorinblitNevada Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Washington v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. PurcellNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. WalkerNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Leonard v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. CombsNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Deshler v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API