Legal Opinion

State v. Combs

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 2000No. 36035PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent Combs has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, arguing that the appeal is moot because retrial is barred by the proscription against double jeopardy. Appellant opposes the motion. For the reasons stated below, we grant respondent’s motion and dismiss this appeal.

Respondent was charged with four counts of sexual assault on a child under the age of 16 years. Specifically, respondent was charged with sexually assaulting a nine-year-old girl. Although the wording of each of the four counts was identical, the State’s theory was that there were two incidents of penile…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. WilsonNevada Supreme Court · 1988

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Wal-MartIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Dominguez v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
  3. Willing (Nicholas) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  4. in Re: Petition of Blenka (Michael)Nevada Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API