Legal Opinion

Murray, Hollander, Sullivan & Bass v. HEM Research, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 14, 1985PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Greenfield, J.), entered March 13, 1984, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, is reversed, on the law, and the motion to dismiss is denied, with costs and disbursements payable to plaintiff.

HEM Research., Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of Maryland with its principal place of business in Maryland. It is the sole general partner of the Maryland limited partnership, HEM Associates, also headquartered in Maryland. They are involved in the business of furnishing laboratory services and conducting medical research,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. McKee Electric Co. v. Rauland-Borg Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. George Reiner & Co. v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Secor v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  5. Hi Fashion Wigs, Inc. v. Peter Hammond Advertising, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kelly v. MD Buyline, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. Worldwide Futgol Associates, Inc. v. Event Entertainment, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
  3. Fenton v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Kaczorowski v. Black & AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Omar v. RozenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API