Legal Opinion

Brams Ltd. v. ELF Enterprises, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1998No. S-96-628PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

This case presents the question: Between two creditors, Brams Limited and the Bank of Papillion, who has priority over a security interest in a debtor’s collateral? The security interest at issue was originally given to the Bank of the Midlands, which after a merger or acquisition, became the Bank of Papillion. The Bank of Papillion filed a continuation statement on the security interest but failed to attach a written statement of assignment as required by Neb. U.C.C. § 9-403(3) (Reissue 1992). The district court determined the continuation statement was not valid because a separate written…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barelmann v. FoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. North Platte State Bank v. Production Credit Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Wolgamott v. AbramsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Continental Western Insurance v. SwartzendruberNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc. v. Newman Grove Cooperative Creamery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mandolfo v. ChudyNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Carpenter v. CullanNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Gomez Ex Rel. Kassandra B. v. SavageNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Baker v. Fabian, Thielen & ThielenNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Veskerna v. CITY OF WEST POINT, NEB.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API