Legal Opinion
Lyke v. Lane County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 26, 1984No. LUBA 83-121; CA A31804PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Petitioners seek reversal of LUBA’s final opinion and order dismissing their appeal. LUBA found that it lacked jurisdiction, because petitioners had failed to exhaust all remedies available by right as required by ORS 197.825 (2) (a) before petitioning the Land Use Board for review. We agree and affirm.
Respondent Murillo filed a zone change application on August 29, 1983, to permit light industrial use of his property. A public hearing was held at which petitioners appeared and testified in opposition to the zone change. On November 15, 1983, the Lane County hearings officer issued an opinion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Fish & Wildlife Department v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Overton v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ayres v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Wallace v. STATE EX REL. PERBCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Taylor v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Taylor v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Colwell v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.