Legal Opinion

Rood v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided August 20, 2014No. 5:13-CV-0435 (LEK/ATB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER

LAWRENCE E. KAHN, Senior District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Paul J. Rood (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action on April 19, 2013, alleging a claim for disability pension benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. Dkt. No. 1 (“Complaint”). Plaintiffs Complaint names the New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund (the “Fund”) and its Board of Trustees (“the Board”) (collectively, “Defendants”) as Defendants. Id. Presently before the Court are the parties’ Motions for summary judgment. Dkt.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jarosz v. Am. Axle & Mfg., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2019
  2. Pellegrino v. First Unum Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021
  3. Vellano v. The Standard Life Insurance Company of New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API