Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mark G. v. Sabol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 23, 1998Published

1DissentWilliams, J.

While I concur in part with the majority view as to plaintiffs’ claims, there are areas in which I believe the majority view to be in error.

The plaintiffs’ claims pursuant to the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 (AACWA; 42 USC §§ 620-628, 670-679a) provisions at 42 USC § 671 (a) (16) and § 675 (1) and (5) (B) are viable, despite the majority’s conclusion to the contrary. The majority relies on Suter v Artist M. (503 US 347) to defeat these claims; however, when Suter is read through the prism of the 1994 amendment of 42 USC § 1320a-2 and Blessing v Freestone (520 US 329, 117…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API