Mark G. v. Sabol
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentWilliams, J.
While I concur in part with the majority view as to plaintiffs’ claims, there are areas in which I believe the majority view to be in error.
The plaintiffs’ claims pursuant to the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 (AACWA; 42 USC §§ 620-628, 670-679a) provisions at 42 USC § 671 (a) (16) and § 675 (1) and (5) (B) are viable, despite the majority’s conclusion to the contrary. The majority relies on Suter v Artist M. (503 US 347) to defeat these claims; however, when Suter is read through the prism of the 1994 amendment of 42 USC § 1320a-2 and Blessing v Freestone (520 US 329, 117…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.