State v. Hallock
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtButtles, J.
The respondent was prosecuted in county court for the offense of operating a motor vehicle upon the public highway after his operator’s license had been revoked. Trial by jury resulted in a disagreement and the jury was discharged. It was then stipulated and agreed by the parties, through their respective attorneys, that the case should be tried by the court without a jury; that the transcript of the jury trial should constitute the evidence to be considered by the court in making findings of fact; and that the judges of the county court, present at the trial by jury, should treat the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gardner v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. BevansSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Dieter v. ScottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
- Wynne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. TrucottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- State v. MargieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
- State v. BromleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
- Bourgon v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
- Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. IzorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.