Legal Opinion
Paul G. Curtis and Mary Curtis v. Nevada Bonding Corporation, Douglass Financial Corporation, and Does I-Xx, Inclusive
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 28, 1995No. 93-16981PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Nevada Bonding Corporation and Douglass Financial Corporation appeal the district court’s remand to the Nevada state district court of state law claims brought by Paul and Mary Curtis. The district court determined that it had subject matter jurisdiction over the Curtises’ claims pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., and that ERISA preempted some but not all of the.Curtises’ state law claims. We hold that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, and we vacate the district court’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Donovan v. DillinghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Concha v. LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Jack Leeson v. Transamerica Disability IncomeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Toumajian v. FraileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Carmen Peralta v. Hispanic Business, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Jack B. Buster, A. Lee Petersen v. Ronald E. Greisen Henry P. Head and David L. RatchyeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.