Tousley v. Tousley
Ohio Supreme Court
In Chancery. Reserved in the District Court of Logan county. The material facts in this case are as follows: On the 9th day of September, I860, Reuben Tousley executed, and soon after delivered to the complainants, William Tousley and John F. Heazlit, a mortgage on lot number one, in Colvin’s addition to the town of Belle Centre, in Logan county, in this State.
Read the full summary
In Chancery. Reserved in the District Court of Logan county. The material facts in this case are as follows: On the 9th day of September, I860, Reuben Tousley executed, and soon after delivered to the complainants, William Tousley and John F. Heazlit, a mortgage on lot number one, in Colvin’s addition to the town of Belle Centre, in Logan county, in this State. The condition of defeasance reads as follows: “ The condition of this deed is such, that whereas the said Reuben Tousley has executed and delivered to the said William Tousley two notes, for four hundred and fifty dollars each, and…
1Opinion of the CourtRanney, J.
It is somewhat difficult to discover the “ important and difficult questions” which weighed upon the minds of the district court, in ordering this case to be reserved. There seems to be but one which we could justify ourselves in taking any space in the reports to consider, and that chiefly for the purpose of explaining a difference between this case and other decisions of this court, which the learned counsel for the defendants seem to have overlooked. It is true, that the notes intended to be secured by this mortgage are very inaccurately described. If error, instead of accuracy, had been…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Waterman v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Schweizer v. TracyIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Chapman & Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Miller v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals · 1924
- Constad v. BuellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.