Legal Opinion

Armour Packing Co. v. Orrick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 4, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from the Probate Court of Oldahoma County. Action for the recovery of -judgment on an indemnity bond. Judgment for the plaintiff for the sum of $201.30 and costs. From which judgment the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BibebR, J.:

B. L. Orrick, defendant in error here, brought his action in the probate court of Oklahoma county, to recover upon an indemnity bond given him to indemnify him against loss, damages, judgments, etc., by reason of the levy of an' attachment which was in his hands in the case of The Armour Baching Company v. W. G. Farrington, brought in a justice court.

The original petition was entitled:

“B. L. Horrick, for the benefit of Albert Farrington, Mrs. Charity Wallace, nee Farrington, and Mrs. R. M. Guinn, nee Farrington-, the heirs of the deceased,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hanlin v. BaxterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  2. Mulhall v. MulhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alcorn v. DennisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Kingfisher Mill & Elev. Co. v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Huntley v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  4. Farrell v. PuthoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  5. Price v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API