Legal Opinion
Lockett v. City of Akron
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 19, 2010No. Case 5:09CV976PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SARA LIOI, District Judge.
Before the Court is the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant City of Akron (“the City”) (Doc. No. 20), plaintiffs’ opposition (Doc. No. 21), and the City’s reply (Doc. No. 22), with a manually filed exhibit to the latter (Doc. No. 24). For the reasons discussed below, the motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
On March 20, 2009, plaintiffs Gloria Lockett and Edward Turner filed a state court complaint against the City and unknown officers 1 asserting claims for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged violations of the Fourth and Fourteenth…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Widdowson v. Lake Cty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026