Legal Opinion
ITT Federal Services Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 29, 1999No. 98-731 CPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
This post-award bid protest action comes before the court on cross motions for judgment on the administrative record. Plaintiff, ITT Federal Services Corporation (“ITT”), protests the decision of the United States Air Force, Air Combat Command (the “Air Force” or “agency”) to award a contract to Northrop Grumman Technical Services, Inc. (“Northrop Grumman” or “Intervenor”) for Counterdrug Surveillance and Control System (“CSCS”) support. Northrop Grumman is an intervenor in the proceeding.
ITT challenges the contract award on the ground that the Air Force did not…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Banknote Corp. of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Ashbritt, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Worldtravelservice v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Allied Technology Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Bean Stuyvesant, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.