Legal Opinion

Amtorg Trading Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 29, 1933No. 204PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The question at issue upon this appeal is as to the right of the taxpayer to deduct certain charges from its gross income for the years 1924 and 1925, as “ordinary and necessary expenses” under section 234 (a) (1), Revenue Act 1924, 43 Stat. 283, 26 USCA § 986 (a) (1) or as' “taxes paid or accrued,” under section 234 (a) (3), 26 USCA § 986 (a) (3). The Commissioner disallowed the deductions, the taxpayer appealed to the Board, which affirmed his ruling. The case comes here on appeal from its order. The facts are as follows: The taxpayer is a New York corporation formed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. United States v. KelloggCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  3. All Russian Textile Syndicate, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ferrell v. BaxterAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Byers v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Byers Transp. Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  3. Central Igualdad, Inc. v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  5. Wyoming Wool Marketing Ass'n v. WoodruffWyoming Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API