Legal Opinion

Vanni v. Cloutier

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 6, 1956No. 4491PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodnow, J.

RSA 556:3 specifically provides that no action shall be sustained against an administrator unless the demand required by RSA 556:1 is exhibited to him within one year after the original grant of administration. These statutory requirements apply to causes in tort for personal injuries as well as to other claims. Hall v. Brusseau, 100 N. H. 87. The commencement of actions within the one-year period by Leo C. Vanni and his wife, setting forth nothing more than a claim in the common counts in each case, was not a sufficient exhibit of their demands for damages on account of personal injuries to…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Casey v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Stewart v. FarrelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  3. Lunderville v. MorseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  4. Cass v. RaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  5. In re Estate of BennettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API