Legal Opinion

Stone v. Risner

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 6, 1900PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Judge Reese. Hart superior court. ■ March term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.

Where the issues in an equitable proceeding for injunction, etc., were referred to an auditor, and at the hearing before him counsel for the respective parties entered into an agreement whereby all issues were eliminated, save one of fact, and evidence upon this question alone was submitted to the auditor, this did not change the character of the case or render it a common-law action, so as to require the judge of the superior court to approve and submit to a jury an exception of fact filed to the auditor’s report. On the contrary, it was his duty to deal with the case as a proceeding in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hearn v. LairdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. City Bank v. CrosslandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mathewson v. ReedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  2. North Atlanta Land Co. v. PortnessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Cranston v. Bank of State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Christian v. BremerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  5. McCrea v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API