Legal Opinion

North Atlanta Land Co. v. Portness

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Judge Pendleton. Pulton superior court. May 10, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. In equity cases submitted to an auditor, to whose report exceptions of law and fact are filed, the trial judge can, in his discretion, decline to submit the exceptions of fact to a jury, unless he approves them. He may disapprove the exceptions and thereupon enter a decree. Stone v. Risner, 111 Ga. 809 (35 S. E. 648); Hogan v. Walsh, 122 Ga. 283 (50 S. E. 84); Austin v. Southern Home Association, 122 Ga. 440 (7), 448 (50 S. E. 382).

2. Where in' an equity case referred to an auditor the evidence supported his findings, the trial judge did not err in overruling the exceptions of fact…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Austin v. Southern Home Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Fowler v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Hogan v. WalshSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Stone v. RisnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Cranston v. Bank of State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dougherty-Little-Redwine-Co. v. HatcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Hicks v. Stewart Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Mathewson v. ReedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  4. McCrea v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Graves v. DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API