Legal Opinion

Barr v. United Gas Public Service Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1935No. 5038PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Judge.

This is a suit for compensation, submitted on the following agreed statement of fact:

“It is agreed by and between counsel for plaintiff and defendants that this case may be taken up and tried on the pleadings filed and the following statement of fact, to wit:
“I. At the time of the injury to Chas. S. Barr, he was employed by United Gas Public Service Company, his occupation being hazardous within the purview of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act No. 20 of 1914, as amended), and this case is governed solely by said compensation act.
“II. At the time of the injury to and death of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Rylander v. T. Smith & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  3. Calhoon v. Meridian Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  4. King v. American Tank & Equipment Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Calhoon v. Meridian Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barr v. United Gas Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. Humphreys v. Schuknecht Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API