Legal Opinion

State v. Privett

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2019No. S-18-775PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCassel, J.

*509 **406 INTRODUCTION

Phillip M. Privett appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He raises two claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Although he asserts that counsel failed to investigate and advise him of a viable defense, his motion failed to allege sufficient facts. He also claims that in response to his hearing impairment, counsel failed to request the court to amplify its voice or employ a telecommunications device. But, the record affirmatively refutes his claim. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

The State charged Privett with first…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. VanderpoolNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. MunozNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. MartinezNebraska Supreme Court · 2019

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. BrittNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. ClausenNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. Oliveira-CoutinhoNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Buttercase v. Davis -- supplemental opinionNebraska Supreme Court · 2023

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API