Horizon Bank & Trust Co. v. Massachusetts
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Circuit Judge.
On the merits this case presents very difficult issues under the Eleventh Amendment about whether the United States, asserting a tax claim, may remove an in-terpleader action to federal court when an unconsenting state, which is also a party with its own tax claim, asserts its Eleventh Amendment immunity and argues that it is an indispensable party. We never reach those merits issues because the appeal is moot. The state has conceded that two other creditors including the United States have superior claims, and that satisfaction of those claims leaves no remaining assets…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- CONNECTU LLC v. ZuckerbergCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Conference of Catholic BishopsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Marks 3-Zet-Ernst Marks GmBh & Co. KG v. Presstek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Ramirez v. Sanchez RamosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Diffenderfer v. Gomez-ColonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.