Legal Opinion
Marks 3-Zet-Ernst Marks GmBh & Co. KG v. Presstek, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 11, 2006No. 05-2794PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Circuit Judge.
This case raises some unusual issues about actions seeking to compel international arbitration.
The plaintiff, Marks 3-ZeWErnst Marks GMBH (“Marks”), a German company, and the defendant, Presstek, Inc. (“Pres-stek”), a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New Hampshire, in 2000 entered into a commercial agreement, which included an arbitration clause.
The arbitration clause is governed by Chapter Two of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. §§ 201-208, which implements the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Crispin-Taveras v. Municipality of CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Vallejo v. Santini-PadillaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Skirchak v. Dynamics Research Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Román v. University of Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2011
- Rivera v. MelendezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.