Legal Opinion
Nisbet v. Bridger
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 20, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00850Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ANDREW CHARLES NISBET, Case No. 3:23-cv-00850-IM Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART v. RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS SPIRIT ROSE BRIDGER, Respondent. Bradley C. Lechman-Su, 1000 SW Broadway St., Suite 2300, Portland, OR 97205. Attorney for Petitioner. Katelyn D. Skinner and Katrina Seipel, Buckley Law, P.C., 5300 Meadows Road, Suite 200, Lake Oswego, OR 97035. Attorneys for Respondent. IMMERGUT, District Judge. Before this Court is Respondent Spirit Rose Bridger’s Motion for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- America Unites for Kids v. Sylvia RousseauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Peter v. NantKwest, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.