Milligan v. Lalance & Grosjean Manuf'g Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
At Law.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
The plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant, and made what they supposed to be an invention of a new and patentable improvement in sheet-metal vessels for culinary purposes, consisting of a shoulder around the inside of the upper edge to support the lid. He assigned it to the defendant to procure a patent upon it and practice it. The defendant applied for a patent; the application was rejected for want of novelty; tlio solicitor amended it to include an inclosed wire at the extreme edge, and the patent-No. 189,250, dated April 3, 1877, was granted for such a vessel, having such shoulder,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eagleton Manufacturing Co. v. West, Bradley & Carey Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Sharp v. TifftU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1880
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stentor Electric Mfg. Co. v. Klaxon Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Dwight & Lloyd Sintering Co. v. American Ore Reclamation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Free-Flow Muffler Company v. KliewerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- McKenna Process Co. v. Blatchford Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1940
- Free-Flow Muffler Company v. KliewerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955