Legal Opinion

R. Dakin & Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided November 30, 1990No. Court 86-11-01431PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

TSOUCALAS, Judge:

Plaintiff, R. Dakin & Company, brings this action pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1514 (1982 & Supp. Y 1985) to challenge the United States Customs’ (“Customs”) classification of merchandise as “dolls, other” under item 737.24, TSUS, with duty assessed at the rate of 14.1 and 13.4 percent (depending on the date of entry). All liquidated duties have been paid and administrative remedies exhausted. Accordingly, this Court’s jurisdiction is properly invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (1982).

Background

Between August 21, 1984 and April 15, 1985, plaintiff was the importer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  5. Russ Berrie & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Toy Biz, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
  2. Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API