Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. National Assets Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1930Published

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

Motion No. 1 is made on behalf of the defendant Pell to compel service of an amended complaint, such defendant claiming that there is a misjoinder of causes of action in the complaint.

Motion No. 2 is made on behalf of the defendant Auger to set aside an order of publication of summons herein.

Motion No. 3 is made on behalf of the defendants William E, Haskell, Luther Martin and M. McAllister Smith, to set aside service of summons made by substituted service.

Motion No. 1: The complaint in this action pleads two representative or derivative causes of action by the plaintiff, on behalf of herself…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Brock v. . PoorNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. German-American Coffee Co. v. . DiehlNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Holmes v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Baker v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API