Legal Opinion
(PS) Peccia v. State of CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 12, 2021No. 2:18-cv-03049Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAKE PECCIA, No. 2:18-cv-03049 JAM AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 15 AND REHABILITATION, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se, and the case was accordingly referred to the 19 undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). The sole defendant in this case, the California 20 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), moves for summary judgment on all 21 claims, ECF No. 69, and plaintiff opposes the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.