Legal Opinion
State v. Huth
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1986No. 85-1965PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
This case requires a construction of R.C. 4549.14 and Evid. R. 601(C). R.C. 4549.14 provides:
“Any officer arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, a person charged with violating the motor vehicle or traffic laws of this state, provided the offense is punishable as a misdemeanor, such officer being on duty exclusively or for the main purpose of enforcing such laws, is incompetent to testify as a witness in any prosecution against such arrested person if such officer at the time of the arrest was using a motor vehicle not marked in accordance with section 4549.13 of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Dayton v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- City of Columbus v. StumpOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. McClellanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. OwensOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- City of Hamilton v. JacobsOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. ButlerOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. Wilson, Unpublished Decision (2-22-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.