Seymour v. Peters
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Manistee. (Judkins, J.) Trover. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
The action in this case is trover for a quantity of pine saw-logs. The suit was commenced by declaration filed and served on the second day of February, *4161886. The conversion oí the logs is alleged to have occurred on the thirtieth day of January, 1886. The logs were cut by plaintiffs, marked with their mark, and deposited upon skidways near a railroad owned and operated by defendant, from whence they were to be transported by rail to Manistee lake. They were cut from the south-east quarter of the south-east quarter of section 5, in township 20 north, range 17 west.
Defendant, claiming to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clark v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Ferton v. FellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Hanscom v. HinmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Ribble v. LawrenceMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by14 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Wessels v. BeemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Olsen v. BagleyUtah Supreme Court · 1894
- Eastman v. GurreyUtah Supreme Court · 1897
- Fowler v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.